Laurent KouadioHome
Research axis 01

Big Data in Earth Systems

Computational geoscience at scale — turning satellite, geophysical and sensor data into physically consistent, explainable forecasts.

2
Deep-learning frameworks

XTFT · GeoPriorSubsNet

4
Data streams

InSAR · EM · ERT · boreholes

3
Open-source tools

GeoPrior-v3 · FusionLab · k-diagram

INP-HB
Teaching

Computational geosciences

What this axis covers

Three strands that together turn Earth data into knowledge others can use.

  • Earth data at scale

    Multi-year InSAR time series, electromagnetic and resistivity surveys, borehole and hydrological records — harmonised into reproducible pipelines.

  • Physics-informed & explainable AI

    Attention-based forecasters and physics heads that respect hydrogeology, so predictions stay physically consistent and interpretable.

  • Teaching & open science

    Computational geosciences taught at INP-HB, backed by open-source packages and documentation anyone can reuse.

Data-Driven Learning

Multi-resolution attention fusion and encoder-decoder backbones that learn complex spatiotemporal patterns from InSAR, piezometric, and geological datasets.

Physics Heads

Dedicated physics head in GeoPriorSubsNet v3 recovers latent hydrogeological parameters — effective conductivity, porosity, elastic modulus — without extra supervision, enforcing physical plausibility at output time.

Case study

GeoPriorSubsNet v3: A Case Study in Physics-Guided AI

GeoPriorSubsNet v3 unifies a probabilistic data head (quantile outputs for cumulative subsidence and hydraulic head) with a physics head that recovers effective hydrogeological closure fields — conductivity, porosity, and elastic modulus — as latent variables. Trained on multi-city InSAR and piezometric data, it outperforms purely data-driven baselines and transfers across cities with minimal retraining.

The physics head acts as an implicit regularizer — it forces the model to learn representations that remain physically meaningful even under distribution shift across cities.
Diagnostics

Uncertainty-Aware Evaluation

GeoPriorSubsNet's probabilistic outputs are audited with the k-diagram toolkit — ensuring that physical plausibility and statistical reliability go hand in hand across all quantile levels.

  • Are physics-constrained forecasts better calibrated than data-only baselines?
  • Do physics heads reduce physically implausible predictions?
  • Where do data-physics trade-offs emerge in multi-city transfer?
In practice

From Research to Practice

GeoPrior-3.0 Forecaster brings GeoPriorSubsNet to practitioners who don't write code — a desktop GUI that covers the full pipeline from data intake and physics-constraint configuration to training, transfer learning, and operational forecasting.

Product page

Key research outcomes

What this line of work has produced so far.

  • 8+

    Publications

    Spanning deep-learning forecasting, physics-informed AI and data-driven geophysics, in JEM, EMS, Computers & Geosciences and JOSS.

  • 2

    Deep-learning frameworks

    XTFT and GeoPriorSubsNet — architectures with probabilistic and physics heads for Earth-system forecasting.

  • 3

    Open-source tools

    GeoPrior-v3, FusionLab-learn and k-diagram — installable Python packages with reproducible tutorials.

  • 1

    Desktop product

    GeoPrior-3.0 Forecaster brings the full pipeline to practitioners who don't write code.

Software & documentation

Open-source tools that put this research into practice.

  • GeoPrior-v3

    Scientific Python framework for physics-guided geohazard analysis, forecasting, and risk-oriented interpretation.

  • FusionLab-learn / XTFT

    Flexible forecasting framework centered on TFT and XTFT variants for calibrated, uncertainty-aware time-series modeling.

  • GeoPrior-3.0 Forecaster

    A guided desktop environment for operationalizing GeoPrior-v3 from data intake to reproducible geohazard forecasting.

Related publications

Peer-reviewed papers and preprints from this line of research.

  • 2024Published

    Machine learning-based techniques for land subsidence simulation in an urban area

    Liu, J.; Liu, W.; Allechy, F. B.; Zheng, Z.; Liu, R.; Kouadio, K. L.*

    Journal of Environmental Management

    Read paper
  • 2025Published

    A mixture learning strategy for predicting aquifer permeability coefficient K

    Kouadio, K. L.; Liu, J.; Liu, W.; Liu, R.

    Computers & Geosciences

    Read paper
  • 2024Published

    K-Means Featurizer: A Booster for Intricate Datasets

    Kouadio, K. L.; Liu, J.; Liu, R.; Wang, Y.; Liu, W.

    Earth Science Informatics

    Read paper
  • 2023Published

    Ensemble Learning Paradigms for Flow-Rate Prediction Boosting

    Kouadio, K. L.; Liu, J.; Kouamelan, S. K.; Liu, R.

    Water Resources Management

    Read paper
  • 2023Published

    watex: machine learning research in water exploration

    Kouadio, K. L.; Liu, J.; Liu, R.

    SoftwareX

    Read paper
  • 2026Under Review

    Physics-Informed Deep Learning Reveals Divergent Urban Land Subsidence Regimes

    Kouadio, K. L.; Liu, R.; Liu, Z.; Jiang, S.; Kouamelan, S.; Liu, W.; Qing, Z.; Zheng, Z.

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

All publications

Continue exploring

Each area feeds into the others — here is where to go next.